Evolutionary Psychology
Every semester I ask students to explain their
favorite and least favorite psychology perspectives. There are no right or wrong answers here…
Each perspective has it’s own merits and pitfalls.
Today, I wanted to write about evolutionary
psychology. It gets a bad rap sort of
like how Michael Jackson did (have I mentioned I am a huge Michael Jackson
fan?). I think people hear the term
“evolution” and automatically jump to the creationism vs. evolution
debate. It’s understandable, but if you
have an aversion just because of it’s name, I encourage you to dig a little
deeper.
Evolutionary psychology is all about using
evolutionary ideas, like Darwin’s survival of the fittest and furthering the
advancement of a species (spreading genes, reproduction) to describe
behavior. Please note, evolutionary
psychology predicts why we might have certain impulses, because those impulses
have served our species well for years and years. However it is not an excuse to necessarily
act on those drives. We do have free
will.
What behaviors might further the advancement
of a species? Let’s look at dating
behaviors as an example:
·
Ever hear people complain that all guys care
about is a girls looks and that girls are gold-diggers? Okay, obviously these statements aren’t
always true, but the fact is these statements are rooted in evolutionary
psychology and there is some truth to them.
o
Men do place physical attractiveness at high
importance because that represents health and fertility. Their primal brain is saying “hey, this girl
looks healthy enough to bare my child and further my genes.” And women do place earning potential and
stability of high importance because their primal brain is saying “he is a good
hunter/gather/earner and can provide for my family which will further my
genes.”
o
Another perception is that men generally are chasing
tail more promiscuous than women.
Again, this thought process is rooted in evolutionary psychology. Men do think about sex often, their hormones cycle over a 24-hour time span, where women’s hormones have more like a 28-day
cycle. According to evolutionary
psychology a man’s goal is to further their genes, which would mean lots of sex
with lots of different women (again, just because you have an impulse doesn’t
mean you don’t have free will), resulting in as many children being produced as
possible. Males basically have an
unlimited number of offspring they can produce.
Women on the other hand are often more selective. We have to be. We do have a limit on how many children we can
have, as it takes us an entire year to produce a single offspring (or two, if
the pregnancy results in twins).
Here's another example: You are on a boat with a grandmother and a 2 year old child. You can only save one of them, who do you choose to save? Most of us are likely to chose the 2 year old, rationalizing that the grandmother has lived a good life, but this child has a whole life ahead of him/her. Evolutionary-ly speaking, that choice makes complete sense: the grandmother can no longer reproduce and is a lot closer to the end of their life, with possible health struggles, than a 2 year old who can grow up and contribute to the species. Again, we do have free will, so we can choose to save whoever we want, but our primal brain may guide us into doing what is best for the survival of the species.
Thank you for clarifying this subject for me because it was my least favorite as I stated in my last discussion post. I thought it sounded too much like creationism.
ReplyDelete